Essay: Should School Athletes Have to Take Drug Tests.

Drug tests in schools are nothing new. They have been administered in high schools and in some private colleges. In 1990, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) instituted a year.

The NCAA is committed to making policy decisions based on quality research data. The NCAA research staff conducts national research for its members on a wide variety of topics including academic performance, student-athlete well-being, finances of intercollegiate athletics programs, gender-equity and diversity issues and many others.

Acton, focused on the school's policy of testing student athletes for illegal drug use. In the American legal system, a person is considered innocent until proven guilty. In James's case, however, the school considered him guilty until he could prove himself innocent—by peeing (clean) urine. In challenging that policy, James Acton's suit uncovered the tension between students' rights as.

Moreover, “(l)egitimate privacy expectations are even less (for) student athletes, since they normally suit up, shower, and dress in locker rooms that afford no privacy, and since they voluntarily subject themselves to physical exams and other regulations above and beyond those imposed on non-athletes.” 391 The Court “caution(ed) against the assumption that suspicionless drug testing.

The study, The Effectiveness of Mandatory-Random Student Drug Testing, examined 7 districts that were awarded grants in 2006 by the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools to implement mandatory-random drug testing programs in their 36 high schools. The districts volunteered to be in the program and were spread across seven states. Because these were districts.

Constitutional issues regarding mandatory drug testing for student athletes were explored by the Supreme Court in Vernonia Sch. Dist. 47J v. Acton (1995). The defendant was a school system in Vernonia, Oregon, a small town about 35 miles northwest of Portland. The school set up a random drug testing program for its student athletes in 1989, motivated by what it described as a drug culture out.

Of most importance, drug testing still is found not to be associated with students' reported illicit drug use--even random testing that potentially subjects the entire student body. Testing was not found to have significant association with the prevalence of drug use among the entire student body nor the prevalence of use among experienced marijuana users. Analyses of male high school athletes.

The one-hundred spring sport athletes (53 males and 47 females) then completed a questionnaire projecting their drug use after a random drug testing procedure was implemented.The student-athletes reported 27% had used drugs at the time of questioning. Four percent reported to use drugs when a random drug testing procedure was implemented. Seniors and juniors (48%) initial drug use levels.

Because drug testing children in schools would need a baseline and that is not a small obstacle to overcome. Each student from kindergarten to twelfth grade would need to be drug tested at the time they are admitted into school at the beginning of their school year. It would allow any discrepancies in the drug testing, allowing for the.

Drug testing in schools EMCDDA PAPERS ISSN 2315-1463 Abstract: Although rare, drug testing in schools continues to be practised in some European countries. In many cases, drug testing is intended to act as a deterrent to substance use. Nevertheless, studies conducted in the United States show that the drug testing of students can have iatrogenic effects, sometimes being associated with an.

This study analyzed the current student drug testing policies of Texas public school districts in the context of the Fourth Amendment rights of students. Court decisions on this issue conflict, and school administrators, attorneys, and other concerned parties may be interested in knowing school districts policies. Responses were received from 827 of the 1,056 public school districts in Texas.

As the Association’s national center of excellence, the NCAA Sport Science Institute is committed to serving and educating student-athletes and our membership. Through collaboration with leading medical and sports medicine organizations, student-athletes, our membership, and key sport stakeholders, the Sport Science Institute has advanced nine strategic priorities.