Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients Essay - 2111 Words.

Drug Testing Welfare Recipients .Drug Testing Welfare Recipients: A Wise Choice Robert Denson ENG1420 Mr. A. Hewlett 10 February 2015 The national welfare system was created in 1935 to provide federal aid to the elderly, disabled and qualifying single mothers during the Great Depression (Costly, 2015). Public housing assistance, the Food.

The welfare program was designed to be a temporary solution to help families in need to get back on their feet, and meet their basic needs.It Is estimated that 50 to 80 percent of family based services involve drugs or alcohol abuse (Chug 2001).Some advantages of mandatory drug testing for welfare recipients are that it fosters self-reliance, averts abuse of the welfare system, gives people an.

Drug Testing For Welfare Recipients Essay example - In a country being run ramped by drugs, it is important for us to evaluate everything that may be contributing to the growth of the drug trade. According to a study conducted by the Substance Abuse Policy Research Program, approximately twenty percent of the welfare recipients questioned admitted to the using an illicit drug at some point in.

The Push for Drug Testing of Welfare Recipients United States lawmakers face one of the most pressing issues of our time-welfare reform.New screening processes, often considered a direct violation of constitutional rights, have already been enacted in many states.Strong evidence exists, asserting that the practice of administering drug testing to welfare recipients will cost the U.

The only problem with these arguments is that, if welfare recipients aren’t abusing drugs, then the drug testing will actually serve to remove some of the stigma of implied drug addiction that many assume even without drug testing. Additionally, it should be pointed out that most jobs also require random and mandatory drug testing done sporadically throughout employment—not just at the.

No Drug Testing For Welfare Recipients Essay - Over many years, America has experienced change in a variety of ways that has impacted people and their way of life. Traditionally, a person works to earn money that will in turn provide basic needs for their family and without a reliable source of income; it makes it virtually impossible to make ends meet.

Proposed legislation in Texas aims to prevent welfare funds from going towards illegal drugs. But drug testing should not be used to deny benefits.

A pilot test of a drug testing regime for welfare recipients in Florida concluded in 2003 that drug testing did not produce reliable estimates of the level of drug use among TANF recipients. (26) In particular, many recipients determined through a validated screening tool as likely to have a substance abuse problem nonetheless tested negative in urine drug screens. Studies have also found.

In recent years, drug testing for welfare recipients has received much attention in the United Kingdom, the United States and New Zealand (Wincup 2014). In the United States, for example, the large number of state legislatures considering the adoption of this policy has recently pushed the subject to the forefront of public debate. To put this in perspective, by March 2016, at least 15 states.

Drug testing works together with another budget measure that removes exemptions from mutual obligation requirements for income support recipients who are temporarily incapacitated due to drug or alcohol dependence. From 1 January 2018, drug and alcohol treatment can be included as a mutual obligation activity.

People applying for welfare benefits should be drug tested Good paper on a difficult subject A current issue that is going on today is welfare recipients that are drug abusers. Welfare is supposed to meet the basic needs. Drugs seem far from one of the basic human needs to me. If the recipient gets all the benefits from the programs they will more than likely turn around and sell their food.

This was proven when Florida and Tennessee enacted drug testing for welfare. In Florida only 2.6 percent of recipients tested positive. Which means the percentage of people using our money to “buy drugs” was less than 3 percent. In Tennessee only 2.6 percent of applicants tested positive. Some people might still think the testing is worth it. However the actual testing cost each state.